A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Performance of official duties;

A. At around 23:00 on December 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol in the 3rd floor of the D basin located in Jung Government-si, and that he was prevented by E, a public interest service personnel belonging to the said D Station; (b) “A person who was employed in the Republic of Korea, who was outside the public place, must be in the superior of the D branch; (c) who was employed in the line of the D branch; and (d) who was in the line of the D branch; and (d) who was fluenced in the line of the D branch; and (e) who was fluced by hand and body of the E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public interest service personnel.

B. At around 21:30 on January 4, 2013, the Defendant, on the ground that he was drunk at the “F” convenience store on the third floor of the said D basin, and that he was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant assaulted, in his hand, such as her clothes, tearing, her clothes, etc., on the ground that he stopped E, a public interest service personnel, who is the above public interest service personnel.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public interest service personnel.

2. Interference with business;

A. A. Around 17:00 on December 3, 2012, the Defendant 1) expressed the victim G in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu “I restaurant” on the road operated by the victim G in Jongno-gu Seoul, and, on the grounds that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine due to the crime of interference with business against the victim, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “I restaurant” to “I restaurant the above restaurant on the ground that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for negligence against the victim,” and attempted to see that the Defendant “I me to find out how much fines have been imposed due to the death, width, etc.,” and prevented the Defendant from entering the restaurant due to his hand. Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force. Accordingly, the Defendant 2) On December 16, 2012, the Defendant was under the influence of the victim’s restaurant business at around 11:00, 200, so that customers could not enter the restaurant, such as in which the Defendant smelted the above restaurant floor and s.