Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 264,841,498 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 10,000,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from October 21, 2015 to October 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On July 27, 2010, the occurrence of an accident and the injury C suffered by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant taxi”) driven a D private taxi owned by oneself (hereinafter “instant taxi”) and driven the first line road in front of the F convenience point in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E.
Plaintiff
A had passed a crosswalk without signalling, etc. of the above road at the time of the invasion.
C was unable to properly see Plaintiff A who passed the crosswalk as above and did not temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk. As such, the part of Plaintiff A’s left part of the front road of the instant taxi was shocked.
(2) The Plaintiff 1 suffered injury (hereinafter “the instant injury”) on the part of the Plaintiff, i.e., the head of the instant accident, the 1st head of the instant taxi, the 1st of the 1st of the 1st of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the
B. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement for automobile damage compensation with C.
Plaintiff
B is the children of Plaintiff A.
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, entry of Gap evidence 6, 7, 8, Eul evidence 1, 2, 6, and 7 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the request for appraisal by the Seoul Metropolitan Government Bola Hospital Head, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The driver of any motor vehicle who is liable for damages shall temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk (if a stoppage line is marked off, referring to the stoppage line at a place where it is marked off), so as not to obstruct or endanger the crossing of pedestrians;
(Article 27(1) of the Road Traffic Act (Article 27(1) of the Road Traffic Act). C does not properly look at the Plaintiff A, who is a pedestrian walking along a crosswalk, and did not temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk, and the accident of this case occurred. Thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident of this case
3...