logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.02.22 2017고합162
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강제추행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

As to the claimant for the order to observe the protected person, the execution of the above sentence shall be completed.

Reasons

Criminal facts

And Facts of the cause of the order to observe the protection : 2017 Gohap 162

1. On March 16, 2017, at around 10:30, the Defendant and the claimant for an order to observe the protective police officer (hereinafter “Defendant”) committed an indecent act against the victim with mental disorder, such as having a mental disorder, such as having a victim F (F, 44 years old), living in the same facility, in the vicinity of the E (B) in which the Defendant living in Daegu-si Si (hereinafter “Defendant”) committed an indecent act against the victim by forcing the victim to commit an indecent act against the victim’s mental disorder 3 years old, living in the same facility.

" 2017 Gohap 239"

2. On June 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:45 to 15:58, the first floor of the D, “G,” where the Defendant living in Daegu-si Si-si, Daegu-si, the first floor of the D, where the Defendant was living, sent the victim H (V, 47 years of age) with mental disorder 3 living in the same facility, kidd the victim’s desire to take the victim’s hand; (b) sent the victim’s chest to the male toilet in the above building; (c) sent the victim’s chest to the victim’s clothes; (d) cut the victim’s chest to the victim’s chest; and (e) cut the victim’s chest to the victim’s chest; and (e) inserted the victim’s sexual organ into the part of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant raped the victim with a mental disability.

"Facts of Grounds for Orders to Observe Protection"

3. The requester of the protective observation order was a person who committed two times a sex crime and responded to the “halfway” level regarding the risk of recidivism of a sex crime (KSAS) as a result of a prior investigation conducted by the protective observation office, and the requester of the protective observation order is at risk of committing a sex crime again against an unspecified person. The requester of the protective observation order is at risk of mental disorder 3, a large number of disabled persons live at the facility held by the requester of the protective observation order, and the crime of this case is re-offending within a short period of time.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Gohap 162"

1. The defendant's person;

arrow