A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 7, 2017, at around 23:38, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 in front of the Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, and received a request from C to return home after listening to the circumstances of the instant case; (b) stated that C was “this hundred and seventys of interest”; and (c) stated that C was “this hundred and seventys of interest.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in cases of attaching evidence photographs, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The elements of sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: A police officer who performs legitimate performance of his/her duties is not guilty of committing a crime by exercising violence. Recognizing that o-friendly elements of sentencing are erroneous and reflective. There has been no record of being punished for the last ten years. o and other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, comprehensively taking account of the following factors, the sentence