1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 18, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as an alien of Bangladesh’s nationality with the status of non-professional employment (E-9) sojourn and stayed with the permission for extension of the period of sojourn, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on August 5, 2015, prior to the expiration of the period of sojourn ( August 17, 2015).

B. On August 26, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff joined the BNP party youth organizations from January 2005, and actively worked on July 8, 2007 by taking charge of general affairs.

The plaintiff and family members have caused terrorism from ABP party members on the ground that they support BNP party, and around August 2012, the home where the plaintiff's parents reside was damaged by the attack, and the father of the plaintiff who had worked as the village representative of BNP party for a long time on October 2013 suffered significant injuries.

The Plaintiff, who was staying in the Republic of Korea, visited the Republic of Korea to the above case, was threatened with the threat that “I am back to Korea as soon as it would have been why you would go back to Korea,” and even recently, the Plaintiff was threatened by telephone that “I am son, I am son, and I am son, if you have returned to Korea.”

Therefore, it is clear that the Plaintiff would be threatened with life threats by ASEAN party members at the time of returning to Korea. Therefore, the Plaintiff constitutes a refugee who is likely to suffer violence, intimidation, and pain on the grounds of political, religious, and status as a member of a specific social group.

Nevertheless, the instant disposition made by the Defendant on a different premise is taken.