1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a person who was admitted to hold as a standing pastor of the Korean Association of Korea, the Korean Association of Korea, and the Korean Association of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “Korean Association of Korea”) is a foundation to which the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Foundation”) is delegated to manage the properties of the church belonging to the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean Association of the Korean War.

(F) The Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea shall be divided from the above one's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea. (2)

On August 19, 1978, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as "each of the real estate in this case", and individually named, the ownership transfer registration under the name of the plaintiff foundation was completed on August 10, 1978 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate in this case"). On April 27, 2007, the ownership transfer registration under the name of the plaintiff foundation was completed on April 27, 2007 for the real estate in this case as of April 27, 2007.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff foundation asserts that the real estate of this case 2 is used as the company house of the B church. The defendant asserts that the person dismissed and expelled from the country of the B church trial, who is not a legitimate representative of the B church, who is the owner of the above real estate, should deliver it to the plaintiff foundation. In response, the defendant, who is the representative of the B church, is the defendant himself, and the real estate of this case 2 in title trust with the plaintiff foundation, is the real estate of this case 2 in title trust with the plaintiff foundation, the plaintiff foundation cannot comply with the plaintiff foundation's claim

3. Determination as to whether the defendant lost the status of a member of the B church

A. (1) On November 201, 201, there was an internal dispute between B and C in relation to the removal and resignation of C and D as the head of the office, and in the Posnnam Association to which B and D belong.