The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (a prison term of 4 years, confiscation, additional collection of 200,000 won, provisional payment order) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is favorable to the defendant that the defendant recognized his/her own crime and reflects the fact that imported phiphones are seized and not distributed on the market.

However, the crime of this case is not only imported by the defendant in China, but also imported in an tight and professional manner, such as hiding phiphones into the bottom of the double panty and spanch panty that he suffered.

As the amount of penphones imported by the defendant is considerably large to 123.4g, there is a high risk of spreading narcotics and committing additional crimes.

In full view of such circumstances, Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines as indicated in the instant pleadings, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.