logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.29 2013고정3551
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2013, at around 21:10 on June 3, 2013, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly breathing the victim, who is a police official belonging to the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Training Police Station, who is a police officer belonging to the Incheon Training Police Station, and informed him of the facts by sending a disturbance, such as breading the vehicle traffic at the Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Incheon, under the influence of alcohol at the 359 Prior Children’s Park for Children and Children’s Park, and committing sound, etc., and neglecting the victim by openly talking the victim at a large level on the following occasions: “Chewing string, ringing, raising all things on the Internet, and interfered with the public performance of the blag.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the second date);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion on the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that he was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder by drinking at the time of committing the instant crime, according to the records, the Defendant was aware of drinking at the time of committing the instant crime, but did not have the ability to discern things at the time of committing the instant crime or make decisions, in light of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, method of committing the instant crime, and the circumstances after committing the instant crime.

Since it seems that the defendant was in a state or weak condition, the above assertion by the defendant is rejected.

arrow