1. In relation to a traffic accident listed in the attached list, the plaintiff under an automobile insurance contract stated in the same list.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract entered in the separate sheet with B.

B. On April 24, 2015, at around 14:39, the insured vehicle of the said automobile insurance contract (a shooting bridge vehicle), C was stopped to transport moving freight in front of 110 D apartment units in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon. At the time, the Defendant, while driving a E vehicle, stopped on the upper right side of the said insured vehicle, which was stopped in the upper right side of the vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

After the accident of this case, the Defendant was provided medical treatment to the Korean Council members, etc. for the treatment of vertebrates or vertebrates attached to spine inverte, chrons and tensions (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, Eul 1 to 8 (including paper numbers) or images, the result of the video verification by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's summary of the party's assertion: The defendant's receipt of a parked vehicle for the transportation of moving freight is merely the defendant's own negligence, and the defendant wears the safety labelling at the time of the above accident, and thus the shock caused by the above accident was not significantly transmitted. The defendant's injury sustained by the defendant is not caused by the accident in this case, since there was a sking of the king at the time of the accident.

Defendant: (a) at the time of the instant accident, the body was caused by a sudden stop; (b) the body was caused by a fire in the future; and (c) the body was actually receiving a therapy for Ampha and trees; and (d) the Plaintiff shall pay the amount equivalent to the medical expenses, etc. as insurance money.

B. According to the evidence as seen earlier, the physical impact of the Defendant at the time of the instant accident can be found to be considerably insignificant. The descriptions and images of the evidence Nos. 1 through 8 are to such extent.