beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 20,833,360 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 4, 2016 to August 31, 2016.
Reasons
1. As to the claim against the defendant A
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s vehicle C (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).
(2) On February 13, 2016, Defendant A driven a vehicle E (hereinafter “Defendant’s side”) and sent to the intersection by reporting to the left-hand turn from the U-turn’s exclusive road (on the road where access to the intersection is prohibited and only the U-turn is marked on the road) in the 33 South-west-gu Incheon Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon, on February 13, 2016, and sent to the left-hand turn, and the left-hand turn was shocked by the Plaintiff’s left-hand side of the F (D’s son) driving on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s side of the vehicle at the two-lane left-hand left-hand turn.
As a result, F and the passenger G on the side of the Plaintiff suffered from the injury requiring two-day medical treatment, such as salt ties and tensions in the border, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was damaged.
(3) The Plaintiff paid KRW 2,33,360,00 for each of the medical expenses and the agreed amount (the treatment cost of KRW 176,680, the agreed amount of KRW 990,00) to F and G on the basis of the automobile injury security and the personal compensation security, and paid KRW 18,50,000 for the automobile repair cost of KRW 18,50,000 on the basis of the self-vehicle damage security (the grounds for recognition). The Plaintiff paid KRW 1,66,680 for each of the medical expenses and the agreed amount of KRW 1,33,60 for each of the medical expenses and the agreed amount of KRW 1,33,00 for each of the medical expenses and the agreed amount of KRW 1,50,00 for the automobile repair cost of the Plaintiff
each entry of this section.
B. According to the above facts finding 1, it is reasonable to view that the accident of this case occurred due to Defendant A’s negligence since the accident of this case occurred by shocking the Plaintiff’s vehicle that was normally left left at the U.S. exclusive lane where Defendant A is prohibited to turn left.
In this regard, Defendant A has the purpose of receiving insurance money even if F reports on the U.S. vehicle from the U.S. exclusive lane to the left.