logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.03.06 2019고정122
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a B-End-Wurt Motor Vehicle.

On December 15, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car on December 2015, 2018, and proceeded to the sub-road to the high-priced intersection in the Hoposi-si, Hoposi-si, Hoposi-si, Gwangju, from the Jinnam-si, and came to be the U.S. top and lower-class, the accident point.

There have been a duty of care to drive safely according to the direction because the white light restricting the change of course is marked on the surface.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the Defendant to the front part of the C driver’s seat in front of the sea-going vehicle, which was proceeding on the same side from the high-priced intersection due to the negligence of the U.S., beyond the limitation on career change.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as “influoral salt and tension,” which requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment to the driver of the victimized vehicle D (V, 33 years of age) due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, photographs of the scene of the accident, photographs related to the scene of the accident, and medical certificates;

1. Diagnosis certificates, investigation reports (Attachment to the contents of the questionnaire of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office related to the scope of safety marking), notification of the inquiries to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office and the details of the inquiries to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office related to safety marks exceptions under the special Acts and subordinate statutes concerning safety signs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order

1. In light of the fact that the white solid lines that the head of the State accused invadedd fall under a part of the marking of a road obstacle (506 attached Table 65 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act), not the marking of restriction on career change (the attached Table 6,506 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act), and thus,

(b) the prohibition of passage, etc.

arrow