logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.23 2014가합563858
대여금
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 6,645,362,038 and KRW 3,000,000 among them.

Reasons

Description of Claim

On July 1, 2013, the relationship between the parties to the non-party Sable Savings Bank (Co., Ltd. prior to the change) was declared bankrupt by the Seoul Central District Court on July 1, 2013 (2013Hahap89) and the plaintiff succeeded to the status and is under bankruptcy proceedings, and the defendant Samsan Dolsan Dold Co., Ltd. is a person who borrowed money in accordance with the credit transaction agreement, and the defendant Samsan Doo Construction Co., Ltd., A, and the defendant B is

The Defendant Samsan-Purgy-based limited liability company in the loan loan loan is a joint and several surety that approved that the basic terms and conditions for credit transaction of the bank of the bank of the bank of the bank of the loan apply to the non-party 3,000,000,000 won on May 9, 2008, the maturity date of the loan of which is set at 11% per annum and 25% per annum, and the overdue interest rate is set at 3,00,000,000 won per annum, and that the Defendant Samsan-Purgy-based limited liability company in the loan of the bank of the non-party 3,00,000 won set the guarantee limit amount to KRW 4,20,000 per annum, and Defendant C jointly and severally pays all obligations owed to the non-party YB bank of the non-party 3,90,000,000.

In accordance with Article 7 of the Framework Credit Transaction Terms and Conditions, the plaintiff of the credit transaction basic terms and conditions and the defendant Samsan High-tech Company decided to lose the benefit of time and to repay the full amount of the debt if there are reasons such as the defendant's failure to pay interest for more than one month from the agreed date.

The Defendant Samsan High-tech Ltd., which lost the benefit of time, paid only interest from September 18, 2009 to September 17, 2009 on the date of payment, and lost the benefit of time after the lapse of January 9, 2010, which is the maturity date of the above loan. The Plaintiff did not pay the principal and interest even though it demanded the Defendants to pay it more than once.

Therefore, Defendant Samsan High-Tech (hereinafter “Defendant Samsan High-Tech”) 6,645,362,038 won and 3,000,000 won among them.

arrow