logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.02.14 2018고단37
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on November 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the front way of “C” located in Ischeon-si B; (b) while she was able to take a large voice to the players, he was reported and called up to 112; and (c) the security guards E (43) assigned to the Dongcheon Police Station D (S) police box in the Gyeonggi-do Police Station where she was called up with the Defendant to ask for personal information of the Defendant. The Defendant she saw the Defendant as “saf of the same saf of the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning reporting processing affairs by E, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (verification of images taken by a victim);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing) of the category 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] criminal punishment, and circumstances that have no record of punishment heavier than the punishment for the same kind of crime and fine, such as the circumstance that the degree of assault used by the defendant is not less narrowly, etc., comprehensive consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the circumstance that there is

arrow