The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below is just in rejecting the defendant's argument about the mental and physical disorder on the grounds of its stated reasoning, and there is no error of law as otherwise alleged in the

Meanwhile, according to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and asserted only unfair sentencing and mental and physical disability as the grounds for appeal.

In such a case, the argument that there is an error of mistake or misunderstanding of legal principles in the judgment below is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Furthermore, even if examining the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.