logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.24 2014고정71
관세법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 43.6 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual representative of C who imports heavy domestic tin products from the wife population B in Young-si.

1. On June 30, 2009, the Defendant in violation of the Customs Act filed a report with the Chinese “ASHINE INC” company, as if it had been USD 5,239, the actual price of Chinese tin products imported from the Chinese “D” company, but was USD 3,259, and subsequently evaded customs duties of USD 204,430 equivalent to the omitted amount in filing a report, as if it had been reported to be USD 3,259, and then filed a evasion of customs duties of USD 1,980, and until September 17, 2012, the actual price of Chinese tin products imported under the name of C, including USD 765,687, in total, is USD 765,687, but the actual price of Chinese tin products was KRW 461,967,967 ($525,79,605,970,920,9206,9206).

2. The Defendant paid the price related to the importation of intermediate domestic tin products from December 1, 2008 to January 21, 2009, without reporting the amount of USD 98,000 (Korean Won 136,45,000) to a third party who is not a party to the relevant transaction, or paid the said amount to a third party who is not a party to the relevant transaction in the name of the third party who is not a party to the relevant transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written accusation or appraisal;

1. Article 270(1)1 and Article 241(1) of the former Customs Act (amended by Act No. 10424, Dec. 30, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply), Articles 270(1)1 and 241(1)1 of the former Customs Act (amended by Act No. 10424, Dec. 30, 201; hereinafter the same shall apply), Articles 270(1)1 and 241(1) of the former Customs Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 15-59, Jan. 30, 200); each of the former Foreign Exchange Transactions Act (amended by Act No. 9351, Jan. 30, 200; hereinafter the same shall apply) is a duty evasion for each offense.

arrow