1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On October 8, 2007, the Plaintiff’s summary of the assertion and the Defendant entered into a goods supply contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to supply goods, such as liquid cromatoma, to the Center for the Traditional Medical Industry by November 8, 2007, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 28,870,600 on October 12, 2007 according to the above contract, but the Defendant did not supply goods agreed to specify the payment period.

Therefore, 20% interest per annum shall be paid from the next day of the delivery of the complaint of this case to the day of full payment.

2. According to each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, it is recognized that there was a contract and money transaction under the name of the plaintiff and the defendant.

However, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is not liable for the return of the price of goods since the defendant merely lent the name of the business operator to the employees employed by B upon the request of B. Since the plaintiff is the actual contracting party B, and the defendant was aware of the fact that he is the name holder, the defendant cannot be held liable for the name holder.

Therefore, without examining the remaining issues, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.