Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

The Defendant operated a commercial sex trafficking business with the trade name "C" in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 1315.

On April 16, 2016, the Defendant received 60,000 won from D, which was found to be a customer at the above business establishment around 00:40 on April 16, 2016, and then, the Defendant engaged in the act of similarity in a way that allows E to talk with D’s sexual character, etc. by hand.

In addition, from April 2016 to April 16, 2016, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes by the above methods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to D or E;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the sentencing guidelines are not applicable because they were selected to impose a fine) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the order of provisional payment (the sentencing guidelines are not applicable) is that the act of arranging sexual traffic has a lot of social harm and injury, such as the commercialization of women's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and thus, it is necessary to eradicate it strictly. Considering the fact that the Defendant advertised commercial establishments using the Internet site, rents officetels, etc. and systematically arranged commercial sex acts, such as the use of officetels as a place of commercial sex acts, the Defendant

However, the defendant's act of committing the crime in this case reflects the wrongness, and the profit therefrom seems not to be much significant without the running period of sexual traffic brokerage business, and there is no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.