logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2016.05.25 2015고정242
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2008, the Defendant is liable for all the expenses, such as insurance premiums and administrative fines, to the victim C before the registered place of business of the vehicle in the Yellow-dong on the 09:30 of the racing-si. The Defendant is not able to register the vehicle under the name of the recipient of the basic living.

“.......”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the cost of the vehicle even if he/she was registered with the vehicle under the name of the victim.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) registered Drocketing II car under the name of the victim; and (c) did not pay the total of KRW 1,589,860,000, such as liability insurance premiums, fines for negligence, and closed stamp, which occurred before scrapping on September 8, 2011; and (d) acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A complaint stating to the effect that, around June 2010, the Defendant requested the victim to scrap the instant vehicle, and the fine for negligence that occurred until that time was able to be processed as the price of scraping, the victim’s liability insurance proceeds, etc. was added after 2010 as it was the wind to scrap the vehicle, and thus, the Defendant does not support the liability for the crime of fraud.

On June 2010, the following circumstances acknowledged by the legitimate examination of evidence by this Court, namely, there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant requested the victim to scrap the instant vehicle, and the Defendant appears to have neglected the instant vehicle to the public place near the restaurant operated by himself, and the victim, who was not aware of the vehicle, was immediately scrapped on the date of discovery of the vehicle.

“The Defendant made a statement to the effect that it was reliable, and the Defendant is obliged to bear liability insurance premiums, administrative fines, etc. imposed on the instant vehicle.”

arrow