A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around September 10, 2016, the Defendant entered into a sales contract to purchase the Seocho-gu E multi-family house (hereinafter “the instant multi-family house”) with D for KRW 1.520 million (hereinafter “the instant sales contract”), and paid a down payment of KRW 100 million shall be substituted by the money paid around July 26, 2016, and the intermediate payment of KRW 100 million shall be paid on October 31, 2016, and the remainder shall be paid on February 14, 2017, and the remainder shall be paid at KRW 445 million and the remainder shall be deducted from the remainder of the lease deposit established in each unit of the instant multi-family house and KRW 430 million,000,000,000,000,000 from the remainder of the lease deposit established in each unit of the instant multi-family house, but the Defendant succeeded to each of the instant multi-family houses and agreed to deduct the remainder from the lease deposit.

On October 8, 2016, the Defendant proposed that D made a lease on a deposit basis with respect to subparagraph 401 of Article 401 of the Multi-Family Housing Act that “The purchase price of which is a mother and child shall be set up, and agreed that D shall deduct the amount of the lease on a deposit basis as much as the lease deposit received therefrom from the remainder, and D, according to the said agreement, concluded a lease agreement with the owner of a lease on a deposit basis at G public official brokerage office located in Soyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu and the aforesaid 401, which is KRW 260 million as to the lease on a deposit basis, and received KRW 26 million on the date of the down payment, and received KRW 2,6 million on November 16, 2016 as the remainder of the lease on a deposit basis.

Around the end of December 2016, the Defendant heard the answer from the National Bank to the effect that he cannot succeed to the obligation of D to the National Bank to the Defendant, and then left the status of the obligor against the National Bank as D, but the principal and interest were repaid by the Defendant.

Nevertheless, from February 14, 2017, the Defendant did not pay the remainder of KRW 185 million to D until February 14, 2017, which is the date of payment for the remainder, and the same month, which is the date of payment for the remainder.