The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant (one year of imprisonment without prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below revealed that the defendant committed a crime against his mistake through a prison life for about four months, that the defendant was the first offender, that the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance, and that the traffic accident of this case was committed in the situation where the defendant lost his consciousness regardless of his will, but the defendant was aware that there was a danger of livering, despite the fact that the traffic accident of this case was committed in the situation where the defendant had lost his consciousness, it resulted in a serious result that the defendant's livering of the vehicle without appropriately taking the livering the livering of his intention, resulting in a livering of the two victims who see or galed in the way, and died due to the livering of the livering of the crime. Nevertheless, the court below did not reach an agreement with the bereaved family members of the victims. The court below seems to have determined the punishment by taking into account all favorable circumstances in the defendant's favorable to the defendant, and there was no special change in the trial court's age, environment, character and behavior, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.