1. As to shares 1653/5950 of the real property listed in the separate sheet:

A. It was concluded on May 31, 2017 between the Defendant and B.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) B arising from the instant claim, along with C, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

2) Seoul Bank (hereinafter “Seoul Bank”)

2) As to the loan transaction agreement with the Seoul Bank, the obligation to guarantee the above loan obligation (hereinafter “instant obligation”) is jointly and severally guaranteed by D, but D, loses the benefit of time due to delay in the repayment of the above loan obligation, and thus, D’s loss of the benefit of time.

2) The Seoul Bank transferred the instant claims to the Korea Asset Management Corporation. The Korea Asset Management Corporation filed a lawsuit seeking the performance of the instant claims with D, B, and C by Seoul Central District Court 2003 Gohap78200, and on October 29, 2004, the said court held that “D, B, and C jointly and severally paid to the Korea Asset Management Corporation the amount of KRW 1,978,780,165, and the amount of KRW 1,319,193,474 from August 1, 199 to September 8, 2004, 19% per annum of KRW 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment, from August 1, 2009 to May 23, 2001 to the date of full payment, 204.

B. The Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) acquired the instant claim from the Korea Asset Management Corporation on September 18, 2012. On October 19, 2012, the Plaintiff sent a notice of assignment of claims to B on behalf of the transferor of the instant claim. 2) On September 11, 2014, the Plaintiff applied for the payment order as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014 tea48960 on September 15, 2014 to extend the prescription of the instant claim, and the said court issued a payment order with the same content as the said judgment on September 15, 2014, which became final and conclusive as is December 11, 2014.

(c).