1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. Gold 4.6 million won and its related thereto on May 2015.

1. The following facts, which determine the cause of the claim, do not conflict between the parties:

On June 15, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) on June 15, 2014, leased real estate listed in the attached list to the Defendant by setting the lease deposit amounting to KRW 50 million; (b) up to August 6, 2016; and (c) the monthly rent of KRW 2.5 million on the seventh day of each month.

B. The Defendant did not pay twice the vehicle until May 7, 2015.

C. On May 26, 2015, a duplicate of the complaint of this case that the lease of this case is terminated on the grounds of the Defendant’s delay of rent was served on the Defendant.

According to the above facts, the lease contract was terminated due to the Defendant’s delinquency on more than two occasions, and the Defendant, as a restoration to its original state, must perform each of the obligations under Paragraph (1) of the Disposition against the Plaintiff.

2. The defendant's assertion argues that the defendant will pay the overdue rent upon the formation of the funds, but such reason does not constitute a ground to block the plaintiff's claim of this case.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.