logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.02 2016가합546246
하자보수에 갈음하는 손해배상
Text

1. Defendant SP Construction Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 1,212,864,026 on the Plaintiff and its related amount from August 24, 2016 to April 25, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a party 1) A apartment in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) The Defendant Korea Land Trust is a company established on April 4, 1996 for the purpose of carrying out the trust of land and its fixtures and its related work on August 196, 2006 for the management of 13 households, and around August 1, 2006, the 13 autonomous management organizations consisting of representatives of sectional owners. The Defendant Land Trust is a company established on December 19, 196 for the purpose of carrying out civil engineering, construction work, housing construction business, etc., and the Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance is a company established on February 19, 196 for the purpose of carrying out guarantee insurance business, etc. under the Insurance Business Act.

B. 1) The Defendant Korea Land Trust, as an executor, obtained a building permit for the instant apartment on September 9, 2003, and the Defendant Branch Es.S. Construction that received a contract from the said Defendant for the construction of the said apartment, started on October 2, 2003, and obtained approval for the use of the said apartment on August 21, 2006. (2) The Defendant Branch Es. Construction began to sell each of the households of the instant apartment prior to the said approval for the use, and completed the sale by all subsequent generations.

C. From August 23, 2006 to August 22, 2007, 831,290,400 2D 2nd August 23, 2006 to August 22, 2006 to KRW 831,290,400 E E from August 23, 2008 to August 22, 2008 to KRW 31,290 from August 23, 2006 to August 22, 2006 to KRW 46,935,604F from August 23, 2006 to KRW 1,246,935,604 to the head of the Daejeon Special Metropolitan City as the Plaintiff’s warranty bond, each of the above changes was made between the Defendant and the Defendant’s each of the Defendant’s warranty bond to the same effect as the Defendant’s each of the instant construction contracts on August 26, 2006.

(b)..

arrow