1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Gap evidence Nos. 8 (including paper numbers), and Eul evidence Nos. 8 (including paper numbers), the defendant, in front of the Busan Southern-gu C apartment security guard's waste collection center on December 28, 2013, the plaintiff, working as the above apartment security guard, was dissatisfied with the plaintiff who pointed out the waste dumping without permission, and raised a complaint to the plaintiff, "I would like to see why we would see why we would see the plaintiff's waste disposal without permission." The defendant was charged with the defendant's summary order on December 24, 2014 by demanding a summary order to 4 weeks on the right hand of the victim, which is moving back to a new knife and moving back to a new knife, and the defendant was charged with the injury of the body and closed nature of the river floor that requires four weeks' treatment at the right hand of the victim, and the defendant was charged with the above injury of the Busan District Court's regular judgment.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant has a duty to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by assaulting the plaintiff.

B. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1) 3 and 4 of medical expenses and the argument, the Plaintiff’s duty of managing apartment security guards may be recognized as having received medical treatment for six days at the E hospital during the period from December 28, 2013 to January 20, 2013 and having paid 88,900 won for the treatment of injury caused by the Defendant’s assault. Thus, the above medical expenses are recognized as the Plaintiff’s active damages caused by the Defendant’s tort. 2) According to each of the evidence Nos. 5, 6, and 7, the Plaintiff was absent due to hospital treatment, etc. for the above injury, and the Plaintiff applied for a substitute worker, and paid 50,000 won per day to F, who is a substitute worker, from December 28, 2013 to March 6, 2014.