A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) around May 20, 2016, at the Seodaemun-gu Btel near the Goyang-gu Btel, Goyang-si, the Defendant: (b) when the registration number plate in front of his relative C’s vehicle quantity was kept in custody as delinquent in the payment of an administrative fine; (c) the Defendant removed the seal of the back registration number plate of the same vehicle in mind to forge and operate the number plate; and (d) copied it to the reproduction machine, and copied it, and forged the air sign registration number plate for the purpose of uttering it to fix it to the front number plate.

2. Around May 24, 2016, the Defendant exercised the forged air defense by operating a forged motor vehicle registration number plate attached in front of the said motor vehicle at Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul.

3. No person who violates the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall forge, alter, or unlawfully use a motor vehicle registration number plate.

Nevertheless, the Defendant used the forged registration number plate which was forged at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (2) without attaching it in front of the above vehicle and used it unlawfully.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs at the enforcement;

1. Relevant Article 238 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 238 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, Articles 78 subparagraph 2 and 71 (1) of the Automobile Management

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that it appears to have committed the same offense as this case several times in light of the criminal records and criminal records of the defendant's like the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is disadvantageous.

However, the defendant argued his own motive for committing a crime and did not repeat the crime, and shows his attitude to reflect the crime.

In addition to the above points, the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime.