(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.05 2015고단521

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.05 2015고단521

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. by having many and unspecified male customers do similar intercourse with D, which is female employees, in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and by having them receive KRW 70,00 per time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant or D;

1. Application of statutes on images of on-site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing [the scope of sentencing conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing] under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following reasons for the suspended sentence] : (a) one month to seven years of imprisonment ; (b) the reasons for the sentencing [the period of imprisonment] / [the reasons for the suspended sentence] / (a) the basic area / [the scope of recommendations] six months to one year [the scope of recommendations] / the short period of business or actual amount of profit (the period of suspended sentence ] - Where there is minor business or actual amount of profit (the period of suspended sentence / The period of suspended sentence ] - Where there is no criminal conviction above the suspended sentence / (the decision of the suspended sentence / the amount of monetary similarity received and similar amount of monetary compensation / The act of arranging the sexual traffic in violation of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes was strictly prohibited, but the act of arranging the sexual traffic was committed in violation of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, but there is no minor benefit that the defendant acquired without the period of operation thereof and there is no penalty for the same type of punishment.

참조조문

-성매매알선 등 행위의 처벌에 관한 법률 제19조 제2항 제1호

-형법 제62조 제1항

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단3499

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.08.21 2019고단484

-수원지방법원 2016.03.29 2016고단119

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.08.30 2019고단1678

-대구지방법원 2019.10.08 2019고단4078