logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.25 2016가단27067
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

In full view of the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 and the purport of the whole pleadings, the building listed in the attached list is owned by the plaintiff, and the defendant currently occupies it. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building to the plaintiff upon the plaintiff's request for exclusion of disturbance.

On August 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) transferred the above building and occupied the above building from D Co., Ltd., which entered into a lease agreement with C management body; (b) accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim was presented as reference materials to the effect that it is unjustifiable; (c) however, there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff, the owner of the above lease agreement and sub-lease agreement, consented to the request for extradition by the Plaintiff,

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow