logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.10.16 2020고단1795
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 27, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,500,000 by the Changwon District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act. On April 14, 2014, the Changwon District Court issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act. On May 9, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 by the Changwon District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On April 24, 2020, the Defendant had been punished three times due to drinking driving, but around 01:32 on April 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the E-benz car while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.116% of alcohol level from the front of the cafeteria at the window B of Changwon-si, Changwon-si to the front of the D-si, Changwon-si.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a e-sports motor vehicle.

The defendant driving a car at the designated border as set forth in paragraph (1) and driving a two-lane road in front of the D-do window in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, along the two-lanes from the intersection of the departure ginseng distance to the F-intersection.

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to see the front side, accurately operate the steering and steering system, and safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was parked on the road on the front side of the road, due to the negligence of neglecting this, and received the part of the Defendant’s G G H Hco or car behind the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle and the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the right side.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant destroyed the above 7,977,945 Won by occupational negligence as above, he did not take necessary measures such as moving the Defendant’s vehicle onto the road side and removing fugitives.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

arrow