The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. One-dimensional scambling, although the defendant's mistake is recognized and against it, and the equality is considered when he was tried along with the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (ththth) in the judgment of the court below. However, all these circumstances are considered in the court below, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it even though he was a repeated crime due to the crime of occupational embezzlement, etc., and in addition, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it. The crime of this case was committed by continuously deceiving the victim E, who is a disabled person of Grade III with intellectual disability, for about three months. In this process, the crime of this case was committed by continuously deceiving the victim E, who is a disabled person of Grade III with intellectual disability. The more committed the crime of forging and uttering the private document of this case, was not agreed with the victims. In full view of all the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.