Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Grand bus in the Republic of Korea.

1. On June 20, 2020, the Defendant driven the above marbing vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.209% on June 23:40, and driven the two-lane road in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the reverse distance one-lane from the reverse distance to the reverse distance.

At the time, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed at night, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the front vehicle in order to maintain the traffic distance for the driver of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the steering wheel and brakes, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty on the front time, and neglected to stop in the same direction from a first-lane to a signal atmosphere, and caused the following part of the victim D (W, 20 years old) driving, which was in the same direction, to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim D, the victim F (ma, 29 years of age), G (ma, 40 years of age) by occupational negligence, respectively, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant is a person who has received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Seoul Western District Court on March 17, 2017 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

The Defendant, as referred to in paragraph (1), was driving a balknife vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.209% in the section of approximately 1.7 km from the parking lot near the Gungdong-dong Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front road of the same Gu.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.With respect to D, F and G, respectively.