A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:06 on February 14, 2019, the Defendant: within “D” operated by the Victim C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant stolen the said Victim’s creshion in a bank in which the market price is equivalent to KRW 2,500, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 7,00,000, which had been displayed at a different place due to a large number of customers, including one fiber-gu, a fiber-gu, the fiber-si, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 3,00,000, the total market price of which is equivalent to KRW 3,00,000, and one hedge-gu, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 6,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on thief photographic data;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to six years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of recommending punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] thief for general property [Type 2] general larceny [Special thief] mitigation element: Living penalty, non-permanent mitigation area (recommended area and recommendation range] special mitigation area, and February to October.

3. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant who was sentenced to punishment one time, etc. for a crime of different species or the same type of crime; (b) the Defendant committed a repeated crime several times during the repeated crime period since 2018, despite having been placed a preference, even if having committed several times during the repeated crime, etc., the Defendant is disadvantageous to the Defendant; (c) the instant crime is against the Defendant; (d) the Defendant is not a crime during the repeated crime period; (d) the Defendant is not a crime during the repeated crime period; (e) the amount of damage is minor; (e) the victim is suffering from a delay; and (e) the health condition and economic situation is very poor; and (e) the Defendant is considered as favorable to the Defendant, and (e) the instant