1. As to KRW 130,00,000 and KRW 30,000 among them, the Defendant shall annually pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 130,000 from December 21, 2018 to February 25, 2019.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the argument stated in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff lent three times to the defendant from August 1, 2018 to August 30, 2018. The defendant set the principal of the loan, including interest, to the plaintiff on November 15, 2018 as total of KRW 140 million, and the amount of KRW 40 million out to the above amount of KRW 10 million until the end of February 2019. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay KRW 130 million to the plaintiff during the period from the day following the loan to the end of February 15, 2018 to KRW 200,000,000 to KRW 150,000 to the day after the due date of repayment; KRW 30,000,000 to the day after the due date of repayment; KRW 130,000,000 to the day after the due date of repayment; KRW 150,015,295.

The defendant asserts that the principal of the loan was paid in addition to the money that the plaintiff was the person who was the person who was the person who was the person who was the person who was the person who was the person who was the person in question. However, the plaintiff and the defendant set up the loan certificate and set up the loan certificate as the principal of the loan amount of KRW 140 million which was not deducted from the prior interest and the fee, and there is no evidence that the defendant paid the additional KRW 3280,000,000 which was not deducted from the prior interest and the fee. Thus, the defendant's argument is

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.