1. Articles 12,818,181 and 17, 201 of the Labor Relations Adjustment Co., Ltd. to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s aforementioned expenses from April 16, 2013 to February 17, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 29, 2012, Defendant Kangsan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Kangsan”) tendered at KRW 226,139,39,394 on the “the construction of the EXPO 2012 EXPO 2012 EXPO 201,” which was announced by Defendant Suh-si (Demand Agency: Agricultural Technology Center at Jeonnam-do, Agricultural Technology Center at the time of leisure) and was selected as a successful bidder.

B. As between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on March 13, 2012, Defendant Kangsan entered into a subcontract with the construction cost of KRW 51,678,00 (including value-added tax) as to the fireworks of the instant construction among the instant construction works, and the construction period from March 13, 2012 to April 20, 2012 (hereinafter “instant contract”). At the end of the said contract, the following: (a) the construction works of the fireworks other than the fireworks are to be carried out in the proportion of this contract to the instant construction works if the negotiations with another company on the instant construction works are reached; (b) the subcontract price of the instant construction works shall be 10% (including completion) at the time of the additional construction works (including completion); (c) the payment of construction price shall be applied for a direct payment for the subcontract; (c) Defendant Kangsan notified the Plaintiff on March 22, 2012 to the effect that each of the instant construction contract was cancelled; and (d) the Plaintiff did not present any ground for cancellation.

2. The parties' assertion

A. Plaintiff 1) The Plaintiff agreed to undertake the remaining construction in the event that the negotiations for the construction of fireworks with other companies upon the conclusion of the contract of this case on the terms and conditions of the contract of this case, which are the special terms and conditions of the contract of this case, had been fulfilled and the construction amount of the contract of this case has been extended to KRW 226,139,394 as the contract of this case was extended to KRW 226,139,394. The contract amount of this case was extended to KRW 226,139,394. The public official of Defendant C and B, who are the public official of Defendant C and B, have illegally abused the contract of this case to Defendant D and C until sunrise, respectively.