The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The statutory penalty for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) under Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, ex officio, is an imprisonment of not more than one year, or a fine not exceeding three million won.

Nevertheless, the lower court sentenced the Defendant to a fine of KRW 7 million, thereby violating the upper limit of punishment.

The judgment of the court below cannot be maintained as it falls under the case of erroneous application of the law and affected the result of the judgment.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the prosecutor's improper assertion of sentencing, and the judgment of the court below is reversed, and it is again decided as follows.

[Grounds for a new judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by the court is identical to the facts stated in the corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 152 of the relevant Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사 소송법 제 334조 제 1 항 양형의 이유 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 벌금 300만 원 이하 ◈ 양형기준에 따른 권고 형의 범위 양형기준이 설정되어 있지 않음 ◈ 선고형의 결정 ◎ 불리한 정상 - 피고인은 도로 교통법위반( 음주 운전) 죄, 도로 교통법위반( 무면허 운전) 죄로 징역형의 집행유예를 선고 받아 집행유예 및 보호 관찰 기간 중임에도 자숙하지 아니하고 이 사건 범행을 저지름 - 피고인은 무면허 운전으로 2회 형사 처벌 받은 전력이 있음 ◎ 유리한 정상 - 피고인은 이 사건 범행을 인정하면서 반성하는 태도를 보임 - 피고인은 운전기사를 고용하여 차량을...