logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.13 2015고정1999
장물취득등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for a crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2015.

In August 2014, the Defendant came to know of the name-free stolen business operator who resides in China through the Internet's job-seeking advertisement on the Internet's website, and tried to deliver the stolen or lost mobile phone according to his direction and receive a fee in return.

On September 21, 2014, at around 10:0, the Defendant transported the 8 mobile phone, a stolen object, by delivering Kwikset service article at the street in front of the So-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, by using Kwikset service article at around 12:30 on the same day.

In addition, the Defendant acquired or transported the cell phone, which is a stolen, over 12 times from September 2014 to September 30 of the same month, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police and suspect examination protocol of the accused;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Each statement of B, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO;

1. Investigation reports (additional seizure against A of a suspect and investigation of damaged articles), investigation reports (in the name of the title holder of the relevant seizure certificate), investigation reports (in the name of the other party of the title holder of the relevant seizure certificate), investigation reports (in the form

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of statutes governing judgment, summary agreement assistance in cases;

1. Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow