logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2013.10.16 2013고정231
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-ro taxi.

On 07. 05. 20:40 on 07. 07. 20. 05, the Defendant continued the front road of the Japanese Private Training Association in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, to the right-hand turn from the distance of the court to the distance of the sports officer.

At the time, the center line has been installed and the vehicle traffic on the road with a large traffic volume, the D observer car operated by the victim C (W, 47 years old) is under normal operation, so if a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is engaged in driving a motor vehicle, he/she has a duty of care to keep the traffic classification from the center line to the opposite direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went beyond the median line, and there was a conflict between the left-hand panion part of the victim's vehicle, which was proceeding normally in the opposite part, and the left-hand panion part of the victim's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the said victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and suffered injury to the victim E (V, 77 years of age) by light clocks, tensions, etc., requiring around three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the fact that the defendant purchases a comprehensive insurance policy for the instant vehicle, the fact that the defendant has no criminal record other than that for a minor fine once in 191, the defendant reflects the crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and home environment, shall be considered);

1. Articles 70 and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow