1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the part of the first instance judgment, i.e., (b) 6 to 13, shall be deleted; and (c) except for the following additional judgments, the reasoning of the first instance judgment shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. As to the validity of each letter (the evidence No. 8, hereinafter referred to as the “each letter of this case”), the defendant asserts that it is difficult to recognize the validity of each letter of this case prepared under such circumstance as the defendant was unable to have a spirit due to the aftermath of October, 1994 due to the aftermath of October, 194, and thus, it appears that it was invalid since the defendant entered into an agreement based on the above letter of this case under the status of his office capacity

The testimony of the witness at the court of first instance may be found to have caused mental problems by the defendant due to the testimony of the witness at the court of first instance. However, the above evidence alone testified that the defendant was aware of the above accident before the formation of the letter of this case and that the witness at the court of first instance cannot memory when the defendant was involved in the accident.

In addition, it is not sufficient to recognize that the defendant has caused mental problems to the extent of mental problems due to the accident, and there is no other evidence to prove this. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

B. As to the interpretation of each of the instant notes, the Defendant merely perceived that the content of the instant notes was erroneous in the registration of the instant land, and argues to the effect that it is difficult to interpret it as an agreement to transfer the ownership of the instant land to the network I.

If the authenticity of a disposal document is recognized, it shall be objectively interpreted that the parties expressed their intent in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in the disposal document, except in extenuating circumstances.