The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below rendered on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is that there are extenuating circumstances in favor of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was a first offender with the university student of the 20th first half of the year, the fact of the crime is recognized, the fact that the damaged police officer does not want the punishment of the defendant.

However, in light of the circumstances of the case, the crime of this case is not less severe than the nature of the crime, and the degree of assault against the victimized police officers is not less weak, and the court below seems to have determined the punishment by reducing the fine amount of the summary order in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant as seen earlier, etc., and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, are too unreasonable.

The above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.