beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.
, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants, who received compensation from the victims E at the time of the Asia-Pacific War, were to receive money from the victims under the pretext of the receipt fee, on the ground that they received compensation from the victims E.
Thus, the defendant A made a false statement to the above victim that "it is possible to receive compensation in an amount equivalent to 50,000 won per capita as compensation for the money contributed by the Japanese people to the extent that it is possible to receive compensation in an amount equivalent to 150,000 won per capita, because it is possible to receive compensation in an amount equivalent to 50,000 won per capita of the money contributed by the Japanese people, with a copy of the male's removal from 189 to 1931, or a copy of the male's removal from 1931, or a copy of the resident registration certificate, resident registration certificate, resident registration certificate, or resident registration certificate of the deceased person who died at the time of the Pacific War."
However, on December 6, 191, 191, the Japanese Civil Claim Litigation Division, to which Defendant B belonged, has already filed a lawsuit against the Japanese government, such as “41 members of the Family Council of Victims of the Asia-Pacific War,” such as “the Family Council” with the Japanese District Court of Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Japan, for seeking the refund of the unpaid wages of Korean military personnel, military personnel, employees, etc., who were drafted for compulsory conscription, and the amount of deposits not received, but the said judgment has become final and conclusive, there was no intention or ability to receive compensation from the Japanese government, even if receiving the payment from the victim.
Nevertheless, Defendant B, as above, by deceiving the victim through Defendant A, received KRW 1 million from the victim on August 24, 2006 at a restaurant where the name near the above shift station is unknown, and thereafter, received KRW 2,259,000 from the victim at least nine times until May 25, 2010, and Defendant A committed the fraud by Defendant B.