The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for a term of one year, confiscation and collection) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below shows the attitude of opposing all of the crimes of this case. The defendant reported another narcotics offender to an investigation agency, etc. However, the crime related to narcotics is not less severe in terms of social harm and risk of recidivism, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and additional collection in 2007 as well as imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, two times with prison labor for the same crime, one time with prison labor for suspended execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and one time with prison labor for the same crime. The court below seems to have taken into account all the above favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstance that differs from the court below and the sentence, and considering all the circumstances shown in the records and arguments such as the defendant's age, character, character and environment, occupation, power, the process, means and result of the crime of this case, and the situation before and after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unfair.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.