logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고정882
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 High 882] On March 8, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face at several times on the ground that the victim E(29 years old) was prevented from lending money within the “D convenience store” store located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

[2017 High Court Decision 1327]

1. On June 2, 2017, at around 04:42, the Defendant damaged the non-repairable property, such as the damage of property, at the second floor office of the victim, a transportation company located in Guro-gu, Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, on the ground that he does not receive himself from the company under the influence of alcohol, thereby destroying the vehicle by walking the entrance due to the decline, and continuously cutting off the entrance of the resting room by the opening of the entrance.

2. On June 8, 2017, at around 18:30, the Defendant: (a) notified the victim G (n) located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F of “H restaurant”; (b) notified the victim that he was investigated by the police due to an indecent act committed by the victim on the charge of coercioning the victim on the preceding day; (c) expressed the victim at a large interest of “to live in the opening, weather, and human life”; and (d) made the customer in the place where he continued to put the customer at the place, by threatening the victim to “Is down the death and scopic death,” thereby obstructing the victim’s business operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 882]

1. Each legal statement of witness E and I;

1. A written statement of E (victims);

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. A damaged photograph (2017 Go fixed 1327);

1. Statement to the effect that the defendant recognizes the damage to property made by this court;

1. Each written statement of G and J;

1. An investigation report (verification of the scene images submitted by the victim);

1. On-site video CDs;

1. Photographs of damage scene;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by cutting down a course;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow