The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the defendant's appeal grounds is that the sentence of the court below that sentenced fine of KRW 1,50,000 to the defendant is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant was compensated for medical expenses, etc. to the victim by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance in which the defendant was admitted, that the defendant was fully aware of the crime in the first instance, that he was the first offender, that he was the first offender, the defendant's health and economic conditions, etc.

Considering all the above circumstances asserted by the Defendant, Defendant, and his defense counsel, the crime of this case committed by the Defendant was committed by the Defendant by shocking seven years of age in the children protection zone with a vehicle and resulting in injury requiring approximately four weeks of medical treatment. In full view of the Defendant’s negligence and the degree of damage caused thereby, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing, including the Defendant’s age and environment, the sentence of the lower court is too too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.