logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.01 2013고정4801
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On June 9, 2013, around 21:25, the Defendant was driving at an aesthetic speed from the Jincheon-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the 1940 Madro Doro 1940.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to ensure that the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely report the traffic situation on the front

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the front-time City, and received the back part of the driver’s seat of the vehicle of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle owned by the victim E owned by the victim E, which is to turn to the left from the front-round area of the front-round city in Bora Park Park.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, destroyed the victim, who is the owner of the said vehicle so as to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,69,416 of the repair cost, and left the scene without immediately stopping the vehicle and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow