1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the owner of the instant forest, and the Defendant is the owner of 330 square meters of D forest land adjacent thereto, and the forest owned by the Defendant is located at a place higher than 2 meters of the instant forest.

The defendant is occupying and using the part of the land in the dispute of this case over the boundary of the forest of this case without permission of the plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to restore the land in dispute of this case to its original state and deliver it to the plaintiff.

2. The entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (including paper numbers) are insufficient to recognize that the defendant possessed the part of the land in the dispute in this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(O) According to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 of this case, E, the former owner of the forest of this case and the Plaintiff’s children, filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking land transfer, and the result of the appraisal was found to have no part of the Defendant at the time, E’s withdrawal of the said lawsuit, and thereafter E’s donation of the forest of this case to the Plaintiff is recognized). 3. The Plaintiff’s claim for conclusion is dismissed.