logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.06.14 2019고합59
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 27, 2018, around 16:30 on September 27, 2018, the Defendant improved the size of the victim D (13 years of age) visited to repair the school uniform in the “C” school uniform store operated by the Defendant in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju-gu. The Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by putting the Defendant’s hand in the back of the victim’s hand, inserting the Defendant’s hand on his hand, continuously inserting his hand into the front part, inserting his hand into the victim’s sexual organ, turning the victim’s sexual organ into the front part, knife, knife, and knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. A copy of a situation description, a copy of the employment union for the head of the first year, a copy of the health union, and a copy of the official document "receiving a report on sexual assault";

1. Determination as to the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of investigation report (Evidence List No. 7)

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant and the defense counsel denied the crime to the effect that “the Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim at the time of the instant case.”

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, it is recognized that the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim due to the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her at the time

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit.

In this court, the victim testified to the effect that "the defendant was measured with her her halth of his halth, while her malth of his malth of his malth, the defendant her malth of his malth of his malth of his malth, added his malth of his malth of his malth, and then her malth of his malth of his malth of the malth of his malth of the malth of his malth of the malth of his malthm, and the

(Attachment 2, 12 pages). The above testimony of the defendant is very consistent and specific from the investigative agency, and is not inconsistent or false.

(b) the witness E shall be a witness;

arrow