The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months.

(b).

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the defendant A: two years of imprisonment, and the defendant B: 10 months of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. 판단 피고인 A는 동종범죄로 1회 벌금형, 1회 집행유예, 1회 실형 처벌을 받았고, 이종범죄로도 5회 벌금형, 1회 실형 처벌을 받은 전력이 있는 점, 피고인 B은 동종범죄로 1회 벌금형, 이종범죄로 1회 벌금형의 처벌을 받은 점, 이 사건 범행은 피고인들이 관할관청으로부터 묘지 개설 허가를 받지 못하여 묘지를 조성할 수 없음에도 이를 숨긴 채 피해자들에게 묘지를 분양하여 분양대금을 편취한 것으로 그 죄질이 아주 불량한 점, 이 사건 범행으로 인하여 피해자들은 새로운 묏자리를 찾아 이미 안장한 시신을 이장해야 하는바, 피해자들의 정신적 고통이 상당할 것으로 보이는 점, 그럼에도 불구하고 피고인들은 당심에 이르기까지 대부분의 피해자들과 합의하지 못하였고, 아직까지 회복이 이루어지지 않은 피해도 큰 점 등의 사정은 인정된다.

However, all of the crimes of this case were led to confessions and reflects in depth. The Defendants agreed with the victim H, M, I, L in the original judgment, and deposited an amount equivalent to the sum of KRW 71 million for the remaining victims. The court below deposited KRW 53,365,200 for the victim H, Z, Z, V, AF, AB, G, AE, Q, Q, X, U, and R; Defendant B participated in the crime of this case from around 2007 upon his father’s request; Defendant B did not focus on the degree of participation; and other matters related to the violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, etc. for which the judgment became final and conclusive; and all of the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, such as equity in cases where the judgment was rendered simultaneously, the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, the environment, motive and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime.