logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.19 2015고정293
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of "D" in Gwangju Mine-gu C and 102.

No one shall sell, lend or distribute drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 00:30 on January 9, 2015, the Defendant, in violation of this, sold the above restaurant, without verifying the age of the above restaurant, after receiving 12,000 won (16 years of age) and 12,00 won (2 diseases and 16 years of age), among three others, juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness E, F, G, and H’s each legal statement [the defendant was aware that the defendant was not a juvenile at the time when he visited D and three other juveniles visit D, and thus, the defendant did not verify the identity card of E, etc. at the time of the instant case, and the case claimed to the effect that it was a malicious stimulation of the relevant juveniles. First of all, according to each legal statement by the witness E, F, and G, the above witness made a statement to the effect that the defendant was not at the time of the instant case and did not confirm the identity card of the witness, and there is no circumstance to suspect the credibility of the statement. Furthermore, it does not seem that there is no objective evidence to support the defendant’s assertion in light of the results of the CD’s reproduction of the CCTV, which contains CCTV video submitted by the defendant for the purpose of destroying the credibility of the defendant’s statement and the result of the document submission order containing the telephone number of 112 reported regarding the instant crime. Meanwhile, it is difficult to apply the relationship between the defendant and the witness in light of the relevant statutes.

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Article 28 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Optional fine;

1. Although the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are economically difficult, in light of the purpose of legislation of the Juvenile Protection Act, equity with similar cases, etc.

arrow