Text
1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building indicated in the attached list.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
3...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) is originally owned by the Heduk Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (formerly changed on May 6, 2015: Co., Ltd.). The Plaintiff purchased the instant building from the Heduk Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. on April 27, 2015, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 22, 2015.
B. On March 10, 2015, the Defendant agreed to purchase the instant building from the Plaintiff for KRW 157,00,000,000, and agreed to take over KRW 95,000 as collateral obligations for collateral security against the right to collateral security established in the name of the mid-to-under Credit Union with the payment method of the purchase price and pay KRW 62,00,000,000 for the remainder.
(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). C.
Around March 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 50,00,000 to the Plaintiff. The promissory note was subsequently disposed of in default, the collateral obligation of the said collateral was not accepted, and the remainder of the purchase price was not paid.
The defendant asserts that he is the buyer and uses the building of this case.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts, the defendant did not pay all the purchase price pursuant to the sales contract of this case to the plaintiff. In the case where the sales contract of this case was terminated by delivery of a copy of complaint of this case, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.