logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.03.20 2018고합3
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
Text

The request for the attachment order of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. A person who has committed a sexual crime against a minor under the age of 19 as shown in the attached Form, and is likely to recommit a similar sexual crime in light of the background or method of the crime and the character and conduct of the person who has requested the attachment order;

Therefore, it is necessary to attach the location tracking electronic device to the person who requested the attachment order and impose the matters to be observed.

2. Determination

A. On March 20, 2018, the instant court rendered a ruling to jointly examine the instant case in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts committed by a minor under the age of 13) and the instant case, which is a specific crime case against a person who requested an attachment order, and rendered a ruling to transfer the instant case to the Juvenile Department of the Changwon District Court, which is the said specific crime case, on March 20,

B. In such a case, when the defendant case, which is a specific crime case, and the competent court of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the juvenile protection, issues how to handle the case of the case of the juvenile case, the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and the Electronic Devices Attachment, etc. (hereinafter “Electronic Devices Attachment Act”) or the Juvenile Act do not explicitly provide for the case of the juvenile act. However, Article 50 of the Juvenile Act specifies the case of the case of the juvenile case as “the defendant case,” and Article 50 of the Juvenile Act specifies the case of the case of the juvenile case as “the juvenile case,” the case of the case of the case of the case of the attachment order shall be deemed as a separate claim with the nature of security disposition. ② There is no institutional system as to how to deal with the case of the case of the juvenile protection case of the case of the case of the attachment order, and Article 4 of the Electronic Devices Attachment Act does not reach the age of 19 years.”

arrow