1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion (1) from June 26, 2002 to May 11, 2004, the Plaintiff driven urban buses from Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”). The Plaintiff asserted the following as to the Defendants, and sought payment of the amount stated in the purport of the claim as damages.

(2) On May 8, 2004, Defendant B, at the parking lot of the Defendant Company’s business office, abused the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff was spawn and spawned while working for the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff was faced with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant accident”), and rather, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Defendant B by asserting that the Plaintiff abused the Defendant B.

Defendant B, in collusion with his spouse, received KRW 1,00,000 from the Plaintiff for the purpose of agreement deposit, etc., and by mobilization of a majority of the false witnesses, led the Plaintiff to bullying, and prevented the Plaintiff from working in the Defendant Company.

(3) Defendant C’s assertion as to Defendant C had the head of the Defendant Company’s operating division engage in bullying from time to time to time in a false fact, and had the Plaintiff prepare a horse, etc., booming the Plaintiff’s breath and booming, etc., and prevented the Plaintiff from working in the Defendant Company.

(4) Defendant D’s assertion against Defendant D had another person make fighting with the Plaintiff, and caused the Plaintiff to do so, and bullying against the Plaintiff, etc.

(5) Defendant E, despite being well aware of the instant accident, was hospitalized in the hospital by having Defendant B engage in the instant accident as if he were the victim, and the Plaintiff was unable to work in the Defendant Company.

(6) Defendant F’s assertion against Defendant F is the president of the Defendant Company’s trade union, and the Plaintiff knew well of the instant accident, and the Plaintiff attempted to be re-employed with the Defendant Company, but the Plaintiff did not re-enter the Defendant Company.